Burning Cash Isn’t the Problem. Burning Alignment Is. Every biotech founder fears the day the cash runs out. You track the burn rate. You watch the runway shrink. You delay hires. You negotiate term sheets from a place of panic. But here’s what most founders miss. 👉 Cash isn’t your biggest problem. Misalignment is. Not the obvious kind either. We’re not talking about personality clashes or investor drama. 👉 We’re talking about the type of quiet misalignment that appears to

High-content screening (HCS) has become a cornerstone in GPCR and phenotypic drug discovery, enabling researchers to quantify cellular responses with spatial, temporal, and mechanistic depth. For GPCR-focused programs, the ability to visualize receptor localization, internalization kinetics, and ligand interactions in intact cells offers advantages that extend far beyond traditional biochemical or radioligand assays. Yet, despite remarkable progress, HCS workflows rema

When David Hodson’s lab teamed up with chemist Johannes Broichhagen aka JB (then a young researcher newly arrived during a home DIY moment), the goal was bold and elegant: Create a photo-switchable ligand to remotely control GPCR signaling with light. This was the moment when photopharmacology felt like the future. The literature was buzzing. Labs were competing. The idea was simple — turn signaling on or off with a flash of light.

Enter a long-term collaboration with chemist Dr. Johannes Broichhagen - aka JB — which, amusingly, began when Hodson opened the door wearing cleaning gloves mid home renovation.

Clean data can still mislead if the underlying assumptions aren’t tested. Schild analysis is one of the few tools that tells you whether your “competitive antagonist” is actually behaving competitively. This week, we help you tighten your interpretations and strengthen your decisions at the bench and in discovery. Breakthroughs this week: McGPCR multimodal model; Endocrine Metabolic GPCRs 2026; Pfizer–Metsera acquisition.

Your scientific thinking built the foundation, but leadership is what scales it. The Invisible Obstacle   👉 Brilliant science. Stalled progress. It’s a pattern we see far too often in early-stage biotech operations and startups. The experiments work. The data looks promising. But decisions lag, the team spins, and investors get nervous. Science isn’t the problem; scientific thinking is. What makes you excel in the lab can quietly sabotage your leadership in the boardroom. 👉

Drug discovery often assumes receptor inhibition follows simple rules—agonist binds, antagonist blocks, and data fit neatly into predictable curves. Yet, any pharmacologist who’s pushed beyond textbook theory knows: biology rarely plays fair. Schild analysis remains one of the few conceptual anchors that can tell us when “simple” truly is simple—and when deeper receptor dynamics are at play.

When you walk into a typical academic lab, the boundaries are obvious: this PI’s corner, that group’s benches, their grants, their silos. But in Melbourne, a quiet experiment challenged that model — and it worked.

The first time Michelle ran a cyclic AMP assay, she did it with a single-channel pipette, trays of melting ice, and the kind of focus that only comes from knowing one mistake could waste weeks of work.

Michelle hadn’t mapped out a scientific empire. She was a student expecting tedium, not inspiration. Yet that summer research placement cracked open a new reality: the thrill of asking questions no one else could answer.

Most pharmacologists are trained to chase targets. But what if the real opportunity lies in the chemical matter we throw at them? That’s exactly what Terry’s Corner delivers this week: a deep dive into molecular creativity, rational design, and the overlooked role of chemistry in innovation. Breakthroughs this week: Orphan receptor GPRC5B in neurogenesis; Septerna’s pill-based weight-loss strategy; Atrogi’s new CEO announcement.

Drug discovery pipelines often stall not because the target is wrong—but because the chemical matter interacting with that target lacks the right properties to produce meaningful pharmacology. We obsess over target validation, signaling pathways, expression patterns, and disease relevance. Yet, far less time is spent scrutinizing the structural logic and origin of the molecules we screen in the first place.

Dear Dr. GPCR Community, If the past few years have been about finding our rhythm, this year has been about refining our systems — and stepping confidently into what’s next. When we started Dr. GPCR, it was with a simple goal: to connect people who shared a passion for GPCR science and discovery. What began as a small, volunteer-driven initiative has grown into a vibrant global network — thousands of scientists, founders, students, and partners who now learn, collaborate, a

Collaboration drives discovery. Dr. Jens Carlsson shows how cross-disciplinary teamwork turns GPCR models into real translational outcomes.

Dr. Jens Carlsson reveals how predictive modeling is reshaping GPCR drug discovery—bridging computation, chemistry, and pharmacology for real-world impact.

Nine out of ten GPCR programs stall not because the target was wrong, but because teams waited too long to test the right thing. Terry Kenakin has seen this story play out for 40 years — and he’s rewriting the ending.

Can GPCR models predict biology? Dr. Jens Carlsson shares how structure-based modeling is transforming drug discovery, and why collaboration is key.

The next edge in discovery isn’t louder exposure—it’s smarter engagement. This week’s Dr. Kenakin from Terry's Corner shows how to tame irreversible drugs so their kinetic power works for you, not against you. You’ll get a framework to predict duration, penetration, and PK/PD separation—so decisions move faster and risks surface earlier. Breakthroughs this week: nanomedicines targeting PAR2 for sustained analgesia; Emerging Voices in GPCR Biology;

This session unpacks how persistent binding can either accelerate your program—or quietly kill it. That’s the power (and the peril) of irreversible drugs. These aren’t just “stronger binders.” They’re kinetic game-changers—compounds that rewrite the relationship between ligand, receptor, and physiologic outcome. Understanding how persistent binding affects receptor turnover, tissue penetration, and PK/PD relationships can give your team a strategic edge.

Discover how Dr. Eric Trinquet, creator of HTRF and IP-One assays, turned failure into breakthrough tools for GPCR science. Learn why play, serendipity, and partnerships fuel innovation—and how this mindset can transform your research and biotech career.

Every drug you design will meet an enzyme before it meets its receptor. If you want your molecules to survive first contact with biology—and with the FDA—enzyme inhibition must be part of your core playbook. This week’s feature breaks down exactly how to think about inhibitors with rigor and speed, so you can make better decisions earlier in the pipeline. Breakthroughs this week: Potentiation of GPCR signaling by ATP and sugar monophosphates; Pharmacology 2025; Nxera Pharma

Before your GPCR ligand ever meets its receptor, it meets the enzymes that determine whether it survives long enough to act. Recognizing, predicting, and leveraging these interactions is the essence of enzyme inhibition pharmacology—the framework that connects molecular survival to clinical success.

If you want cleaner decisions, start with the system—then the ligand. This week’s lead feature unlocks a deceptively simple lever that separates signal from storytelling, moving programs forward with fewer surprises. That’s precisely what Terry’s Corner delivers: practical tools from Dr. Terry Kenakin to elevate your science and sharpe It’s a curated toolkit designed to help GPCR professionals move faster, with more confidence. Premium Members count on this every week—and t

What it really takes to launch a GPCR product—years of failure, science, and strategy. Go behind the scenes of pH-Sense with Revity’s Dr. Eric Trinquet.